Shemini: procedure
Why should I be surprised by the death of Nadav and Avihu? They didn't follow the prescribed procedures. Would I be surprised if a patient took his chemotherapy incorrectly and died? Would it be a surprise if a person were exposed to insensible radioactivity and died as a result? When I took organic chemistry in college, I was afraid to go to the lab, lest someone fail to follow instructions and cause an explosion or release toxic fumes. Originality in a dangerous endeavor can be fatal.
In matters of belief, variation in practice has resulted in millions of deaths. The battles between Catholics and Protestants, Sunni and Shiites , Capitalists and Communists.... differences that are almost imperceptible to those outside,have killed millions of believers on both sides. Thus, the introduction of a variation in the ritual, as Rabbi Eliezer ( quoted by Rashi) puts it: 'acting without consulting the legal authority (Moshe)' is a capital offense.
I have just returned from a Passover program. The majority of participants were of Persian descent. Their prayer service, Sefardic, is different form my usual Ashkenazic liturgy. There is no war here. I can pray with them. I recognize their Jewish validity, they recognize mine.
The problem specified in the story of Nadav and Avihu is the introduction of strange fire. We understand that fire is not matter; it is an ongoing, catalytic process, a conveyance of sufficient heat to maintain the chemical reactions that generate heat. What is a strange fire? It is a new catalytic process, a new way to generate an alternative self renewing process, something that can, under the wrong circumstances, cause a meltdown.
Variation is tolerable. Novelties introduced in a state of impaired judgement are dangerous. The risk of a meltdown is not tolerable.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home