Ve’Ethchanan: Echad (Gd
is One)
א =1
A major, fundamental theme of this week’s
parsha is Echad, that Gd id One. The dramatic Shema, the Hebrew pledge of allegiance
to (our) Gd is stated. By virtue of its internal text, instructing recitation
of “these words” וּֽבְשׇׁכְבְּךָ֖ וּבְקוּמֶֽךָ׃
when you lie down ( in the
evening) and when you arise ( in the morning), the Shema, this paragraph that starts with the
declaration that Gd is One is recited every night and every morning. As is the
rule for declarations, it is to die for … but
the meaning is obscure.
The plain meaning of this statement: Gd is One is exclusivity. There is no
other Gd ( that counts, that is real) ,
That idea is explicit in this parsha.
אַתָּה֙ הׇרְאֵ֣תָ
לָדַ֔עַת כִּ֥י יְ
ה֣וּא הָאֱ
אֵ֥ין ע֖וֹד
מִלְּבַדּֽוֹ׃
To thee it was shown,
that thou mightest know that the Lrd he is Gd; there is none else beside him.
There can be no doubt that the shema declares this allegiance to the singular
entity which has the god properties.
This parsha is always read on the week of Tisha Ba’Av , the commemoration
of Jewish defeat, loss of autonomy and bad luck. We recall the destruction of
the Temple in Jerusalem (and the independent nation that it symbolized), the
(consequent) persecutions of the Diaspora (the Roman persecution, the Crusades, the Holocaust, among them) and express
our longing for Zion ( an undefined word). This year, I realized how the loss
is made worse by Echad, the One Gd. Once you
have whittled down the powers that control the world to one, and the One fails
to act, does not rescue, you have reached the bottom of bleak. There is no
appeal except to the Gd that has rejected you, the Gd who has raised questions
about existence. That seems to be part of the plan.
The mathematical meaning of One ( the loneliest number) has evolved. The implications
of this most fundamental of numbers were always there, but the implications were
discovered as new needs and new ways of looking at the world emerged. The scope
of these definitions has been constrained by the association with Gd.
One means unity. Rationality is the most comfortable of contexts. It
reflects a pre-Renaissance, trust in the senses worldview. Aleph, א, is
the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet.
The Talmud (Sanhedrin 21b) records that the block Hebrew letters we use
today were (may have been) borrowed from
the Assyrians. Nevertheless, these
shapes were chosen, and they have lasted.
Consider the aleph as if it were a fraction, turn it on its side. There is something, maybe a number, maybe not,
over the same quantity. Like 10/10 or 7/7.
It is one. No matter the quantity, the same over the same quantity is
always one, and one is always a quantity over the same quantity. The constancy, the independence from
circumstance, the fairness of this principle is (or has become) apt for the description
of Gd. This is a One that I can hear.
The rational understanding of
one implies that unity means complete, whole. There is nothing missing, nothing
extra. It is an element of perfection, and it may be that perfection that we actually
want to attribute to our Gd. One is an important aspect of perfection.
One is the First (the ordinal
property). There is no number representing existence that precedes One. This
originator quality is needed for the Prime Mover of Aristotle and Maimonides.
The First has a claim of ownership and hence dominion.
One implies existence. There is
one. For an invisible and intermittent entity, existence is the act of faith.
This giant leap into the truth of the imagined catalyzes all progress and makes
everything possible.
The unique property of Gd has
an interesting mathematical representation,
There are (at least) two symbols, based upon the ꓱ, which means “there
exists.”
ꓱ! Emphasizes the existence
aspect. ꓱ=1 emphasizes the Oneness. Mathematics meets monotheism.
Discoveries of the Renaissance (calculus and statistics)
challenged the ordinary reality ( real world truth) of (an approachable but unreachable)
One. Quantum mechanics challenged the
meaning of a fixed state and intelligible existence. Current data science
brings the comfort of assigning “TRUE” to one, but that may soon be challenged
by quantum computing with in-between states.
One always has been a matter of
faith.
A table from my Limud Talk given
January 2023
period |
issue |
nature of 1 |
mathematical |
concepts |
|
Torah |
nation building |
national |
whole numbers/fractions |
exclusivity |
|
Prophets |
relations with empires |
imperial |
geometry/unit circle/trig |
limited spaces |
|
Gaonim |
competing failths |
Universal? |
zero/algebra |
existence |
|
Rishonim |
exile |
philosophical |
rationals/pi |
1/1, true lens |
|
Renaissance |
science |
transcendental |
calculus |
Approach: delta epsilon |
|
statistics means can never have 1 |
|||||
Modern |
belief |
spiritual |
(Hilbert-Banach) space |
one without deity, ying yang of aleph, |
|
group of naturals |
|||||
now |
mistrust |
comforting |
data science |
1= true |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home