re'eh
The nature of "the good" is democratic, the people keep it as a common; and that good supersedes personal taste and bias. The people as a whole keep the ancient
message, they check each other for the accuracy of transmission. The people as whole modify that message as necessitated by circumstances, especially circumstances that physically remove them from that center, the exile that alienates
This is also an instruction that defies the
situation. That central place, its
geographic and tribal location, have not
been defined. That is not the important
part. The fact that it had these properties, that it is not a concept, that it
has coordinates and terra firma beneath
it are important. We retrofit Shiloh and Jerusalem, but the text comes in a context
that predates these settlements. Later events, the kingdom of David, fixed Jerusalem as an eternal Zion. I am struggling to understand what that means now; I am certain it has not meant unity. The holiness of Jerusalem today is the inscrutable sanctity that I do not understand
It is said that at one time, the sacrificial rite, the ritual slaughter of animals and sprinkling their blood, was the core Hebrew ritual activity. To many modern individuals, this is a distasteful idea, the prayers for the restoration of these rituals are said with ambivalence. These rituals served to unify the people. They brought a significant portion of the nation together in one place, where they could renew their relatedness. They provided the nation with a set of activities that are theirs's alone. They established uniqueness.
The parsha contains other methods for the maintenance of Hebrew distinctness: kashruth and the festivals of Passover, Shevuoth and Succoth. These are sets of customs that have unified and differentiated the Jews for hundreds of generations.Is the distinctiveness of the Jew important? Is it a “good. ”
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home